AJA Asian Journal of Anesthesiology

Advancing, Capability, Improving lives

Case Report
Volume 52, Issue 1, Pages 43-45
Chih-Hsien Wang 1 , Kwok-Wai Cheng 1 , Chao Long Chen 2 , Shao-Chun Wu 1 , Tsung-Shiao Shih 1 , Bruno Jawan 1 , Chia-Jung Huang 1
261 Views


Abstract

Coagulopathy is common in patients with end-stage liver disease requiring liver transplantation (LT). Thromboelastography (TEG) test results are used for analyzing coagulation data and making a decision about the transfusion requirements. However, whether it is necessary to correct the abnormal coagulation profile during LT is a matter of considerable debate. Herein, we report our experience with two patients who had LT without blood product transfusion despite TEG results showing abnormal coagulation data. The TEG was performed four times during LT. Although blood product transfusion was necessary according to the TEG guidelines, it was avoided. At the end of operation, the hemoglobin level was 8.5 g/dL and 9.5 g/dL for Patient 1 and Patient 2, respectively. The patients tolerated LT well and their subsequent recovery was uneventful. We suggest that TEG should be used cautiously to make a decision about blood transfusion, as it can be totally avoided in selected cases involving living donor LT.

Keywords

blood component transfusion; living donors; liver transplantation; thrombelastography;


1. Introduction

Coagulopathy is common in patients with end-stage liver disease requiring liver transplantation (LT). Whether the coagulation profile during LT should be monitored with thromboelastography (TEG) and the abnormal data, if found, be treated subsequently are issues of considerable debate.12 Herein, we present two cases involving living donor LT (LDLT) with abnormal coagulation profile reported by TEG. Although abnormal data should be corrected according to the TEG guidelines, it was avoided. The operation was completed without using any blood products.

2. Case report

We retrospectively reviewed the anesthesia charts of the two patients (one child and one adult). General anesthesia and intraoperative monitoring, except TEG, were performed as previously reported3; in addition, the fluids and blood replacement policies were followed as previously reported.4 TEG (Haemoscope Corporation, Niles, IL, USA) was performed for each patient at the following four time points: T1, at baseline prior to incision; T2, 4 hours after incision; T3, 10 minutes after the anhepatic phase; T4, 15 minutes after reperfusion. The anesthesiologist in charge determined the replacement of fluids, and was blinded to the TEG data. The TEG data were later analyzed after the LDLT. The results of the fluids and blood transfusion were compared with the TEG treatment guideline as reported earlier.5

Patient 1 was a 10-year-old child with liver cirrhosis due to extrahepatic portal vein occlusion, and Patient 2 was a 47-year-old adult with end-stage liver disease due to hepatitis B and hepatocellular carcinoma. Preoperative laboratory values of Patient 1 and Patient 2 were as follows: hemoglobin, 9.5 g/dL and 13.2 g/dL; platelet count 35 × 103/μL and 86 × 103/μL; international normalized ratio, 1.21 and 1.19; and activated partial thromboplastin time, 30.4 seconds and 36.7 seconds, respectively (Table 1). The data on timing and other TEG values are shown in Table 2. Although TEG guidelines recommend transfusion of blood products when abnormal profiles are found,5 it was avoided; the total blood loss was 420 mL and 950 mL with an Hb level of 8.5 g/dL and 9.5 g/dL at the end of the operation for Patients 1 and 2, respectively.

Table 1. Characteristics of the two patients.
Table 1.
Download full-size image
Table 2. Coagulation on TEG of the two patients.
Table 2.
Download full-size image

To support hemodynamic changes in Patient 1 and Patient 2, colloids (5% albumin)—600 mL and 2800 mL, respectively—and crystalloids—4545 mL (10.8 mL/kg/hour) and 9550 mL (10.1 mL/kg/hour), respectively—were used. The patients tolerated LT well and were extubated 14.3 hours and 13 hours, respectively, after the operation (Table 1). Postoperative recovery was uneventful.

3. Discussion

In the LT setting, blood loss and replacement of blood products may vary widely ranging from minimal to massive levels.678 Because preoperative and intraoperative coagulation profiles are not related and are only weak predictors of intraoperative blood loss,29 whether coagulation profiles should be monitored and treated accordingly is an issue of considerable debate and remains controversial.210 TEG is a reliable and rapid monitoring system in LT. In a previous study, a 33% reduction of blood and fluids infusion volume was achieved using TEG.11 However, Reyle-Hahn and Rossaint2 found that intraoperative determination of coagulation profiles is not important in directing the blood products used in LT. Massicotte et al12 reported that 79% of their patients did not receive blood transfusion during LT without monitoring of the coagulation profiles, and the same authors found that fresh frozen plasma (FFP) did not reduce the use of blood products, and the survival rate was worse in patients who had received FFP.13 We have also published our method of blood replacement in pediatric patients undergoing LT without monitoring of the coagulation profiles, wherein 42% patients did not require intraoperative blood transfusion.4 A similar policy was applied in our adult LT patient. The TEG monitoring was performed by personnel of the TEG Company as a demonstration of the TEG device, and the anesthesiologist in charge was blinded to the TEG results. Therefore, blood replacement and management of fluids were performed4 similar to our previous report and were not influenced by TEG results and treatment guidelines.5 Table 2 shows that intraoperative TEG of the two patients, values in bold letters, indicated abnormal data requiring treatment as suggested previously.5 According to the treatment protocol, 6–8 pooled units of platelets should be given when the maximum amplitude was less than 55 mm, 5 units of cryoprecipitate when the alpha angle was less than 45°, and FFP should be titrated to provide a reaction time of less than 10 minutes.5 No uncontrollable bleeding was noticed perioperatively (Table 1). 

Bleeding in LT is a multifactor variable, and is not simply related to coagulopathy; other factors that contribute to bleeding in LT are surgical techniques and anesthesia management,14 previous abdominal surgery,9 central venous pressure,12 presence of collaterals with portal hypertension.2 Furthermore, the coagulation concepts of liver cirrhosis have changed recently, and it is found that abnormal coagulation data do not adequately reflect the clinical hemostatic status of patients with cirrhosis, because of the simultaneous changes of prohemostatic and antihemostatic pathways.15 Therefore, careful clinical observation of the operation field concerning the bleeding is important, more than prophylactic correction of the coagulopathy, as overhydration can cause more bleeding.2

In conclusion, correction of intraoperative hemodynamic changes using colloids and crystalloids should be considered as the priority rather than correction of coagulation abnormality. In addition, TEG should be used cautiously to make the decision of blood transfusion as it can be totally avoided in selected cases involving LDLT.


References

1
Y. Kang
Coagulation and liver transplantation
Transplant Proc, 25 (1993), pp. 2001-2005
2
M. Reyle-Hahn, R. Rossaint
Coagulation techniques are not important in directing blood product transfusion during liver transplantation
Liver Transpl Surg, 3 (1997), pp. 659-663 discussion 663–5
Article   Download PDF   CrossRef  
3
B. Jawan, V. de Villa, H.N. Luk, Y.S. Chen, Y.C. Chiang, C.C. Wang, et al.
Ionized calcium changes during living-donor liver transplantation in patients with and without administration of blood-bank products
Transpl Int, 16 (2003), pp. 510-514
4
B. Jawan, V. de Villa, H.N. Luk, C.S. Wang, C.J. Huang, Y.S. Chen, et al.
Perioperative normovolemic anemia is safe in pediatric living-donor liver transplantation
Transplantation, 77 (2004), pp. 1394-1398
5
L. Shore-Lesserson, H.E. Manspeizer, M. DePerio, S. Francis, F. Vela-Cantos, M.A. Ergin
Thromboelastography-guided transfusion algorithm reduces transfusions in complex cardiac surgery
Anesth Analg, 88 (1999), pp. 312-319
6
T. Yuasa, N. Niwa, S. Kimura, H. Tsuji, K. Yurugi, H. Egawa, et al.
Intraoperative blood loss during living donor liver transplantation: an analysis of 635 recipients at a single center
Transfusion, 45 (2005), pp. 879-884
7
K.W. Cheng, C.L. Chen, Y.F. Cheng, C.C. Tseng, C.H. Wang, Y.S. Chen, et al.
Dextrose in the banked blood products does not seem to affect the blood glucose levels in patients undergoing liver transplantation
World J Gastroenterol, 11 (2005), pp. 2789-2791
8
S.C. Yang, C.L. Chen, C.H. Wang, C.J. Huang, K.W. Cheng, S.C. Wu, et al.
Intraoperative blood and fluid administration differences in primary liver transplantation versus liver retransplantation
Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan, 49 (2011), pp. 50-53
9
A. Steib, G. Freys, C. Lehmann, C. Meyer, G. Mahoudeau
Intraoperative blood losses and transfusion requirements during adult liver transplantation remain difficult to predict
Can J Anaesth, 48 (2001), pp. 1075-1079
10
Y. Kang
Transfusion based on clinical coagulation monitoring does reduce hemorrhage during liver transplantation
Liver Transpl Surg, 3 (1997), pp. 655-659
11
Y.G. Kang, D.J. Martin, J. Marquez, J.H. Lewis, F.A. Bontempo, B.W. Shaw Jr., et al.
Intraoperative changes in blood coagulation and thrombelastographic monitoring in liver transplantation
Anesth Analg, 64 (1985), pp. 888-896
12
L. Massicotte, S. Lenis, L. Thibeault, M.P. Sassine, R.F. Seal, A. Roy
Effect of low central venous pressure and phlebotomy on blood product transfusion requirements during liver transplantations
Liver Transpl, 12 (2006), pp. 117-123
13
L. Massicotte, M.P. Sassine, S. Lenis, R.F. Seal, A. Roy
Survival rate changes with transfusion of blood products during liver transplantation
Can J Anaesth, 52 (2005), pp. 148-155
14
M. Deakin, B.K. Gunson, J.A. Dunn, P. McMaster, G. Tisone, J. Warwick, et al.
Factors influencing blood transfusion during adult liver transplantation
Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 75 (1993), pp. 339-344
15
T. Lisman, S.H. Caldwell, A.K. Burroughs, P.G. Northup, M. Senzolo, R.T. Stravitz, et al.
Hemostasis and thrombosis in patients with liver disease: the ups and downs
J Hepatol, 53 (2010), pp. 362-371

References

Close