Abstract
Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) dislocation can occur whenever the mouth is opened wide during upper airway manipulation, even without external force. In the perioperative period, the majority of TMJ dislocations occur during anesthetic induction. We report the occurrence and management of bilateral TMJ dislocation upon orotracheal extubation in a 35-year-old woman. At the end of an otherwise unremarkable uterine myomectomy under general anesthesia, with the patient having regained consciousness in the operating room, we asked the patient to open her mouth so we could extubate her. Immediately after orotracheal extubation, however, the patient was found to be unable to close her mouth. The diagnosis of bilateral TMJ dislocation was made. The bilateral TMJ dislocation was reduced with the traditional transoral approach under morphine analgesia/sedation. The dislocation possibly occurred in consequence of her compliance with our request to open her mouth excessively before she was fully awake. As TMJ dislocation is a possible complication of upper airway manipulation, anesthesiologists should be prepared for its occurrence and to manage it competently.
Keywords
anesthesia, general; anesthesia recovery period; dislocations; intubation, intratracheal; temporomandibular joint;
1. Introduction
Dislocation of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is not an uncommon event. It can occur without exter-nal force when the mouth is opened excessively wide during upper airway manipulation for anesthesia and therapeutic management of trauma. In the periop-erative period, the majority of TMJ dislocations that occur during anesthetic induction could be evoked by yawning,1−3 jaw thrust maneuvers,4−6 direct laryngoscopy,4,7 or the use of a laryngeal mask airway (LMA).8
We report here a case whose bilateral TMJ dislo-cation was noted immediately after orotracheal ex-tubation. Manual reduction of the dislocation was successfully accomplished under morphine analge-sia/sedation.
2. Case Report
A 35-year-old, 48-kg woman, who had suffered menorrhagia-induced anemia, was admitted to our hospital for uterine myomectomy. Preanesthetic evaluation revealed that she had undergone hem-orrhoidectomy smoothly under spinal anesthesia, otherwise her past history was unremarkable. On examination, there were no airway problems. Her mouth opening was good and her dentition was normal.
In the operating room, she was given fentanyl 100 μg, thiopental 250 mg, and atracurium 25 mg intravenously for induction of general anesthesia. Orotracheal intubation with an endotracheal tube (Hi-Contour tracheal tube; Mallinckrodt Medical, Athlone, Ireland) of 6.5 mm internal diameter and 8.8 mm outer diameter was performed under direct laryngoscopy easily and uneventfully at the first at-tempt, without the need to open the mouth wide. A Berman oral airway, 80 mm in length (Cheen Houng Enterprise, Taipei, Taiwan) with a body thickness of 9 mm was inserted into the oropharyngeal cavity to act as a bite block. Thereafter, the patient’s upper and lower incisors were kept in close contact with the Berman airway placed in between, i.e., the interincisor distance (IID) was 9 mm. Inhalational desflurane in oxygen was used for anesthetic main-tenance. No additional muscle relaxant was given throughout the operative course. Morphine 4 mg was given intravenously for postoperative analge-sia before the completion of surgery. Muscle re-laxation was reversed using neostigmine 2 mg and atropine 1 mg intravenously. The patient recovered well from anesthesia. Neither bucking, coughing nor retching was noted when the endotracheal tube was still in situ. When the patient regained con-sciousness, she was asked to open her mouth for oral endotracheal tube extubation. The endotracheal tube was then removed along with the Berman air-way. Immediately after extubation in the operat-ing room, however, the patient was found to be unable to close her mouth. Her jaw was locked wide open in a protracted position, with an IID of about 30 mm and without deformed configuration. Any active effort to correct the problem by herself was unsuccessful. She also complained of pain in the bilateral preauricular regions. Bilateral empty glenoid fossae and spasmodic masseter muscles were noted by palpation. The diagnosis of bilateral TMJ dislocation was made. Morphine 2 mg was slowly given intravenously to provide analgesia/sedation for bimanual transoral reduction of the dislocation. The patient was then placed in a semi-recumbent position. The operating anesthesiologist stood be-side the patient, with his left and right thumbs placed onto the occlusal surface of the patient’s right and left lower posterior molars, respectively, while his fingers grasped the patient’s mandibular angle and body. Upward rotation of the patient’s chin (by downward pressure exerted with the thumbs and upward elevation from below the chin with the fingers) followed by force applied poste-riorly to the entire mandible, was carried out to generate the reduction. This manipulative ap-proach was similar to that described by Stakesby Lewis,9 which could readily correct the bilateral TMJ dislocation simultaneously.
Upon inquiry, the patient denied any prior history of TMJ dislocation. She made a good recovery and was discharged 3 days later.
3. Discussion
The TMJ is a unique, modified hinge joint whose motion allows two kinds of movement to take place. Besides the familiar hinge-like rotation between the mandibular condyle and the inferior surface of the articular disc, an anterior gliding movement of the condylar process of the mandible along with the superior disc surface toward the articular tu-bercle of the temporal bone can occur to enable the mouth to open widely.4,10 As the glenoid fossa is shallow, an “overshot” anterior movement of the mandibular condyle can result in anterior TMJ dislo-cation, which is by far the most common type of TMJ dislocation.
As upper airway management is an important item in the daily practice of anesthesiologists, it is no wonder that TMJ dislocation is liable to be a source of a lawsuit for anesthesiologists. An analysis of 266 claims for airway injury by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Closed Claims Project database11 showed that 27 claims (10%) were filed for TMJ injuries, with a median com-pensation of US$10,000. Among these 27 claims, 11 were for TMJ dislocation and 16 were for TMJ pain. These TMJ injuries were associated with non-difficult tracheal intubation, patients younger than 60 years of age, and ASA physical status 1−2. The circumstances of our patient fit exactly with all the conditions mentioned above.
Although TMJ dislocation is a well-recognized complication following general anesthesia, in this context it is usually diagnosed on a retroactive basis and it may be difficult to ascertain when the dislocation actually occurred, partly because its diagnosis can be difficult with an orotracheal tube or an LMA in situ,2,12 and partly because palpating the patient’s glenoid fossae after airway manage-ment is a far from routine procedure in a patient without a past history of TMJ dislocation. For ex-ample, three cases of perioperative TMJ disloca-tions were reported by Prasad and Agrawal5 and by Rastogi et al.13 Prasad and Agrawal5 presented a case in whom TMJ dislocation was diagnosed after removal of an LMA: a jaw thrust maneuver to fa-cilitate LMA insertion was considered to have evoked the dislocation. Rastogi et al13 reported two cases without pinpointing the causative events: one pa-tient was extubated awake in the operating room, but TMJ dislocation was not diagnosed until the pa-tient was found to be unable to close her mouth in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU); the other was extubated in the PACU but TMJ dislocation was diag-nosed as late as about 24 hours postoperatively in the ward.
As to when TMJ dislocation occurred in our pa-tient, a few possibilities existed: (1) the patient might have had preexisting dysfunction or hypermo-bility of the TMJ but appeared normal or was over-looked preoperatively; (2) TMJ dislocation could occur during anesthetic induction. Possible precip-itating factors included the effect of the muscle relaxant (which was given only once and was effec-tive), direct laryngoscopy,4,7 and placement of an oral airway;14 (3) TMJ dislocation occurred as our patient opened her mouth excessively in compliance with our request to open her mouth for orotracheal extubation.
The last supposition was supported by three con-siderations: (1) when the mouth is opened too wide, the ligaments supporting the articular disc of the TMJ must lie lax and thus predispose the TMJ to dislocation;4 (2) reduced muscle tone caused by re-sidual effects of general anesthesia and muscle re-laxant might have weakened the protection around the TMJ4,15 and thus contributed to TMJ dislocation during emergence from anesthesia in this patient; (3) spontaneous movement (if at all) of a dislocated mandible is usually limited14 or restricted to pure rotation.9
However, our patient’s upper and lower incisors remained in close contact with the Berman airway until we asked her to open her mouth, which resulted in her IID increasing from 9 mm to about 30 mm, and then her mandible remained in that position and could not be moved at all. Therefore, the possibility that the TMJ dislocation had already occurred be-fore our patient opened her mouth seemed remote.
Accordingly, while other possibilities could not be completely ruled out, wide mouth opening for oro-tracheal extubation was the most likely causative event for TMJ dislocation in our patient. Even if partial dislocation of the TMJ had occurred before emergence from anesthesia, mouth opening for ex-tubation would induce spasm as well as pain of the muscles of mastication, aggravate the dislocation, and lock the condylar process of the mandible.
TMJ dislocations should be quickly diagnosed and promptly reduced to minimize following sequelae (such as fibrosis of the joint capsule) and to avoid the need for surgical intervention.13 Various methods of manual reduction for acute TMJ dislocation have been employed in clinical practice for years. The transoral approach described by Stakesby Lewis9 is traditionally preferred. Shun et al16 and Chen et al17 separately introduced novel extraoral ap-proaches, and each claimed their technique to be effective, analgesia/sedation/relaxation-free, and safer for the clinicians because finger insertion into the patient’s mouth was avoided. We success-fully treated our patient using the traditional trans-oral maneuver because we thought it was much more straightforward.
Employing drugs for analgesia/sedation or even general anesthesia (with or without a muscle relax-ant) may be needed to counteract pain and spasm of the masticatory muscles and to lower the clini-cian’s risk of bite injury during manual reduction of a dislocated TMJ. The necessity of these pharmaco-logical regimens should be judged individually. In our patient, the effects of residual anesthesia and the supplemental morphine were adequate to allow successful reduction of TMJ dislocation.
To reduce a bilaterally dislocated TMJ, some physicians9,16,18 advise that reduction be done one side at a time because it is easier and less painful. Fortunately, we successfully reduced bilateral dis-location simultaneously in our patient.
In conclusion, we have reported a case of bilat-eral TMJ dislocation that possibly occurred during orotracheal extubation and was successfully reduced under mild analgesia/sedation. This case reminds us that TMJ dislocation is a potential complication of upper airway manipulation. Anesthesiologists should be aware of this problem and be prepared for its occurrence and management.